tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-394374973544543030.post1932592418681083991..comments2024-01-27T03:21:12.068-07:00Comments on Dreaming in Satellite: Comic-Spirit Attendinggila_monhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03242200331389303203noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-394374973544543030.post-5095973673862321822014-01-11T18:00:46.317-07:002014-01-11T18:00:46.317-07:00wonderful!
ZQwonderful!<br />ZQZQhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08521836993023109556noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-394374973544543030.post-2481757621543924272014-01-08T10:46:58.254-07:002014-01-08T10:46:58.254-07:00not familiar with him, but you draw the picture we...not familiar with him, but you draw the picture well - and that last stanza is a strong turn ~Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-394374973544543030.post-31142813012805476882014-01-08T04:11:03.037-07:002014-01-08T04:11:03.037-07:00fresh piece - fresh imagery - keep 'em coming...fresh piece - fresh imagery - keep 'em coming Gila!Brother Olliehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07506492407482879487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-394374973544543030.post-84870093456852504602014-01-07T19:53:44.605-07:002014-01-07T19:53:44.605-07:00I think you're right, but so many of the comic...I think you're right, but so many of the comic pairs seem dated (Laurel and Hardy, Jackie Gleason and Art Carney, Abbott and Costello). There was one allusion to Quixote and Panza -- still in the sidekick archetype I think. I'll work on this one. gila_monhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03242200331389303203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-394374973544543030.post-59353429140826628892014-01-07T19:38:25.980-07:002014-01-07T19:38:25.980-07:00hmm...i might go with a more familiar sidekick or ...hmm...i might go with a more familiar sidekick or maybe include a line with an allusion to one more familiar so that the correlation becomes a bit more evident?Brian Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00722940075884718007noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-394374973544543030.post-69081172909725640132014-01-05T08:01:00.494-07:002014-01-05T08:01:00.494-07:00That's the tricky part. The poem is obviously ...That's the tricky part. The poem is obviously referencing the specific, an almost insider knowledge, to an Arizona kid's tv show. But, trying to open it up so that it stands on its own even without prior knowledge. Not sure how close I am with this one, but it was a fun and nostalgic trip. <br /><br />I was trying to tap the archetype of the sidekick, the playful counterpunch to the straight man. gila_monhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03242200331389303203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-394374973544543030.post-30393171808123592262014-01-05T06:37:10.618-07:002014-01-05T06:37:10.618-07:00i never saw the show...i did look it up on reading...i never saw the show...i did look it up on reading this...still i am probably missing some reference...louisville slugger chivalry sounds a bit scary up front...letting go fo the tail later on, no longer following...nice rhythm regardless...Brian Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00722940075884718007noreply@blogger.com